Tuesday, December 12, 2017

Sale Continues at Family Tree DNA

DNA kits for genealogy remain on sale at Family Tree DNA through December 15, 2017.

Use a coupon code for additional savings.

The Family Finder test can be taken by anyone and is a great start to your genetic genealogy pursuits.



Discount
Code   EXPIRES DECEMBER 17, 2017


$10 off Family Finder
R32VOLGAF465
$10 off Family Finder
R32G2IP1Z1DP
$10 off Family Finder
R329FCUWMHMI
$10 off Family Finder
R32DTE7XJJSQ
$10 off Family Finder
R32CSV3NZJ14
$10 off Family Finder
R32S2R31OW3F
$10 off Family Finder
R32GTLDAFLW3
$10 off Family Finder
R32R4RAQ3CYB
$10 off Family Finder
R32GUVJ7F9RQ
$20 off Y37, Y67, or Y111
R32QY98MOT79
$20 off Y37, Y67, or Y111
R32XGK4FYT5A
$20 off Y37, Y67, or Y111
R32GVRH2TL0N
$20 off Y37, Y67, or Y111
R32ZLZ8QGF4A
$20 off Y-DNA 67
R32JBQCN94PF
$30 off Y-DNA 67
R32X39IUZCW5
$20 off Y-DNA 111
R32H7REGN9KI
$20 off Y-DNA 111
R32M1J853B9S
$30 off Y-DNA 111
R32WOBTII44V
$30 off Y-DNA 111
R32VX2VDIUKQ
$40 off Y-DNA 111
R32WZ79OCPJ1
$50 off Big Y
R32C4CX4JQO0
$50 off Big Y
R32XPL5AE04G
$20 off mt plus or full sequence
R3200C9NJ2A3
$30 off mt full sequence
R323E38RWX6G
$40 off mt full sequence
R32D1AX6IJ9I


Tuesday, December 5, 2017

More Coupons for the Family Tree DNA Sale

The sale continues on DNA kits for genealogy at FamilyTreeDNA.com.

Below are coupons good for one use. They expire on December 10, 2017.

If you have not tested before, start with Family Finder. The sale price is $59 (plus shipping). Below are three coupon codes for $10 off this test.

Even if you have nobody to test, order a kit so you have it handy in case you bump into a relative whose DNA would be useful. Have them do the test immediately to ensure that it gets done. Mail it yourself. (I speak from experience.)


Discount
Code   
EXPIRES DECEMBER 10, 2017


$10 off Family Finder
R30YWMP5TXDS
$10 off Family Finder
R30W2E1AD3NN
$10 off Family Finder
R30E8362X4JS
$20 off a purchase of $150 or more
R306WM6IQRZV
$20 off a purchase of $150 or more
R30LB8439VSE
$20 off a purchase of $150 or more
R30PBQH5R6IL
$20 off a purchase of $150 or more
R30CPGEJ3FT6
$20 off a purchase of $150 or more
R30USDMZ8DK7
$20 off a purchase of $150 or more
R30LILDC0PAZ
$20 off a purchase of $150 or more
R30FELQHU40P
$20 off Y37, Y67, or Y111
R30T7OT63V0A
$20 off Y37, Y67, or Y111
R30C2OUFI204
$20 off Y37, Y67, or Y111
R30NAYA35JOW
$20 off Y-DNA 111
R301QRTZT18Z
$20 off Y-DNA 111
R31I2HE902VJ
$30 off Y-DNA 111
R305RX2Z1L67
$30 off Y-DNA 111
R30T9UHTN40W
$30 off Y-DNA 111
R3070SDDAXE2
$30 off Y-DNA 111
R30CTDNDRI5R
$30 off Y-DNA 111
R30DW0TC02LY
$25 off Big Y
R30FHZI7L0UT
$50 off Big Y
R30KWF8N9ZK1
$40 off mt full sequence
R307PC3FE1NA
$40 off mt full sequence
R30C4VINB925
$40 off mt full sequence
R30HJ1ZZ4GKG
$40 off mt full sequence
R30BMXKC7O9U
$40 off mt full sequence
R305AOYI2E1A


Sunday, November 26, 2017

Living DNA Accepting Transfers (For Free)

Earlier this year I tested my autosomal DNA with Living DNA.

This company does not provide relative matching, which is my main focus in testing DNA. Instead, Living DNA provides a detailed ethnicity breakdown concentrated in Great Britain and Ireland.

Interesting, but I have not made much use of these results in my research.

In October, Living DNA began accepting uploads of files from other DNA testing sites. This means that you do not have to send in a specimen.

Living DNA calls this endeavor One Family One World.

Relative matching is a predicted future service, which is great.

While logged into my account, I uploaded my mother's DNA file from 23andMe using this link. (She is deceased, so she cannot test anymore. I have only her DNA computer file to work with.)

I had to wait for "transfer instructions" in an email.




Now we wait until next year for possible relatives to appear for my mother at Living DNA.

Next, I tried my father. I could not upload his file using my account.



You need a separate email address for every file transfer. So I uploaded both parents and that was it. I could create several more email addresses just to upload more people to Living DNA, but that would be onerous.

If Living DNA wants to grow its database of participants, requiring separate emails hinders this goal. But the price is unbeatable.


Thursday, November 23, 2017

Family Tree DNA Sale with Coupons

DNA tests for genealogy are on sale at Family Tree DNA.

Buy some for family you have not tested yet (a gift for both of you).

Buy a few to have on hand in case you bump into a relative whose DNA would be helpful to your family history research.

Below are additional discount codes. They expire November 26, 2017.

Discount
Code   EXPIRES NOVEMBER 26, 2017


$20 off Y37, Y67, or Y11
R24CIXVXQ8G3
$20 off Y37, Y67, or Y11
R24YTASC0VQJ
$20 off Y37, Y67, or Y11
R24MWOSQ5HBN
$20 off Y37, Y67, or Y11
R24S9LWCDWTZ
$20 off Y37, Y67, or Y11
R24AX4IP6IQT
$20 off Y-DNA 67
R24GQ8U9C4QA
$30 off Y-DNA 67
R24RDGX9QF3C
$30 off Y-DNA 67
R248Z177MUSY
$40 off Y-DNA 67
R2478S310W7T
$40 off Y-DNA 67
R24CXQ2XWPDI
$40 off Y-DNA 67
R24AC9SXGJHI
$40 off Y-DNA 67
R24QXOYYY1EH
$40 off Y-DNA 67
R24T5UYIBIML
$40 off Y-DNA 67
R24G7A8VXS14
$40 off Y-DNA 111
R242KZA1F8E6
$40 off Y-DNA 111
R24Y5X617VPR
$40 off Y-DNA 111
R24FZNPQMHEV
$40 off Y-DNA 111
R24GI5LYG8N6
$40 off Y-DNA 111
R2461OOA6XTV
$40 off Y-DNA 111
R24D5025V71H
$40 off Y-DNA 111
R2499V76O72Z
$40 off Y-DNA 111
R24LNSQ6B02R
$40 off Y-DNA 111
R24WNNMHTSYA
$25 off Big Y
R24FDO2E01WX
$50 off Big Y
R24EA62WRI2M
$30 off mt full sequence
R24E0THI6IFI
$40 off mt full sequence
R24CS6J01VPG
$40 off mt full sequence
R24E9O280E0V


Tuesday, October 31, 2017

DNA of Preston Sheehy Descendants at 23andMe

Another Preston/Sheehy cousin tested his DNA at 23andMe.com. K.J. is the father of D.J., who tested four years ago. D.J. was the first relative I identified from my DNA pursuits.


Below is the family tree of the descendants of John Preston (1857-1928) and Bridget Sheehy (1857-1916) who tested at 23andMe.





Below is the chromosome browser view of the shared DNA between K.J. and his three second cousins. Note the wide variation in the amount shared from 195 centimorgans (cM) to 364.




Also important is that the amount of shared DNA drops when we shift from father to son. The amount was not halved; it was quartered. (This is why it is best to test members of the oldest living generation whenever possible.)



23andMe has an "In Common With" feature. This list shows DNA testers who match you and a target person. In the scenario below, I looked for relatives in common with my mother and K.J. Sharing the same DNA indicates that the DNA tester is likely from their shared Preston/Sheehy lines. One DNA tester, R.S., could be a viable lead.




R.S. shares a segment of DNA with the oldest generation of Preston/Sheehy descendants. The chromosome browser reveals that my mother shares the longest segment and this segment broke in the middle. My uncle received one piece while K.J. and my mother's first cousin received the other piece.


R.S. has no family tree offered through 23andMe. This is a common problem with matches at 23andMe- the lack of genealogical information and interest.


The other observation to garnish from this information is that the amount of shared DNA skews greatly beyond the parent - child relationship. In groups on FaceBook, I often see people trying to determine generations or half relationships based on the amount of shared DNA of people well beyond a sibling relationship. You simply cannot do this based on shared DNA alone.

Please see the latest Shared Centimorgan Project by Blaine Bettinger for the ranges of DNA shared by relatives up to a fourth cousin. The numbers found in my cousin comparisons fall within these expected amounts.





Tuesday, October 24, 2017

The Baptism of Bridget Sheehy in 1857 in Limerick, Ireland

Someone from Ireland (possibly a cousin) wrote to me about my Sheehy and Frawley ancestors of County Limerick. He had seen my blog post about trying to connect my second great grandmother, Bridget Sheehey (1857-1916), to a Sheehy family living in Dutchess County, New York, USA.

He had located the baptism record of Bridget, daughter of Edmund Sheehy and Bridget Frawley, on the microfilm for Lurriga (also called Patrickswell), in Limerick. The date was January 4, 1857. According to the death certificate of my Bridget, her parents were Edmund (or Edward?) Sheehey and Bridget Frawley of Ireland.


Bridget, daughter of Edmund Sheehy and Bridget Frawley, baptized January 4, 1857.
Sponsors were Timothy Sheehy and Bridget Flannery (more possible relatives).

You can view these church records for free through the National Library of Ireland. The site is also an excellent resource for detailed maps of divisions within the counties.


Can I finally fit Bridget into this family?
Created in Family Tree Maker 2017

Bridget Sheehy does not show up in Ancestry.com's index for this microfilm. However, Margaret and Ellen, possible sisters of Bridget, do show up in the index. But Ancestry.com calls this place "Clarina," not Lurriga or Patrickswell.

So I continued forward on the roll (online) from Bridget in the year 1857 to the year 1864 and found the entry for Margaret. Same place, Lurriga, same name, Sheehy. Another clue that there is a connection.


Margaret Sheehy baptized November 13, 1864 in Lurriga, Limerick, Ireland.
Sponsors were John Galvey (?) and Margaret Cosgrove.



Clarina is not listed as an alternate name for Lurriga. It could be. (Researching old New Jersey place names is hard enough.) But I was looking for Bridget in Clarina and not finding either when Bridget was indeed baptized in the same location as her supposed sisters near the birth date I have for her.


Neighboring parishes may also have records on the family, if the records still exist (another roadblock in Irish research).



Note: "Sheehy" and "Sheehey" are used interchangeably here.

Monday, October 23, 2017

Death Certificate Provides Range of Dates for Death

Andrew Newcomb met a sad death in the winter of 1928-1929. He became lost and froze to death. He was missing for over five weeks.

Andrew and my third grand aunt, Emma Newcomb (1855-1890) had at least four children before she died. They lived in Matawan, Monmouth County, New Jersey. After Emma's death, Andrew married Annie McKee in Brooklyn in 1892 and they resided in New York.

I previously wrote about Andrew when the lack of a specific date of death was brought to my attention via Find A Grave.

Ironically, Emma's date of death is also questionable.

Andrew's tombstone reads 1851-1929.

Green Grove Cemetery, Keyport, Monmouth County, New Jersey

Newspaper accounts explained that Andrew left home from Westbury on Long Island, New York in December. His body was found in January of 1929 in Laurence Harbor, Middlesex County, New Jersey. He may have been trying to visit family in nearby Keyport or Matawan, Monmouth County.



The next piece of evidence needed was Andrew's death certificate from the New Jersey State Archives.

Madison in Middlesex County is now called Old Bridge.
(Not to be confused with Madison in Morris County.)


The death certificate explains, "left home Dec 15, 1928 and found Jan 21, 1929."
"Left home Dec 15, 1928 found in the woods Jan 21, 1929. Died from exposure."




This is the (modern-day) map of Andrew Newcomb's starting and ending points. This is not an easy trip to make today because of traffic.




Andrew may have been traveling by train and got off at the wrong stop, Laurence Harbor, which is near his probable destination of Keyport or Matawan. He may have become disoriented. When he left home on December 15th, this time of year is the least amount of daylight. If he did not have a place to stay by early darkness, he was left to the elements.


I have two questions.

First, how would someone likely travel from Long Island to the coastline of the Raritan Bay in the late 1920s? Would Andrew have taken a train and then a boat? Was he dropped off at the wrong port? Or could he have taken a train through the shore points and exited at the wrong stop? (See this link for old maps of the area, including the train routes.)


Second, what date of death is to be used in a situation like this, when the person was missing for over five weeks? The date the body was found? He did not die that day- he was already frozen. The time frame overlaps two calendar years, so neither year is definitely the year of death.